PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 8 , Pages 698-702, August 2010

Rehabilitation Outcomes of Stroke Patients Treated With Tissue Plasminogen Activator

  • Zeev Meiner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology, POB 24035, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 91240 Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Z.M.
  • ,
  • Anna Sajin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Isabella Schwartz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Jeanna Tsenter, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Ivelin Yovchev, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Roni Eichel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Tamir Ben-Hur, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Ronen R. Leker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem, Israel

Received 26 March 2010; accepted 18 May 2010.

Objective

To investigate the influence of thrombolysis on functional outcomes after rehabilitation.

Background

Systemic thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is considered the mainstay of acute stroke therapy and was found to improve short-term outcome.

Design

Matched case-controlled design.

Setting

Inpatient neurology and rehabilitation departments.

Participants

Thirty-seven patients given tPA and 37 control patients not treated with lytics because of protocol limits.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from a cohort of stroke patients who were treated with systemic tPA. The rehabilitation outcome of thrombolysis-treated patients was compared with that observed for tPA-ineligible and age- and stroke severity-matched patients treated at the same neurology and rehabilitation departments.

Main Outcome Measure

Neurological evaluation was assessed with the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS). Activity of daily living was measured using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument. Functional outcome was measured using the modified Rankin scale (mRS).

Results

The treatment group included 37 patients given tPA; 37 tPA-ineligible patients served as controls. On admission to rehabilitation, there were no significant differences in functional, neurological, and rehabilitation parameters between the groups. At the end of the rehabilitation period, NIHSS scores were significantly lower in the thrombolysis group (P = .036). More patients in the thrombolysis group reached functional independence defined as mRS ≤2 (20/37 versus 10/37; P = .03). At the end of rehabilitation, total FIM score (mean 102.8 versus 93.9; P = .039), total FIM gain (mean 27.8 versus 21.4; P = .09), and total FIM efficiency scores (0.8 versus 0.43; P = .013) were higher in the thrombolysis group and more patients in this group were discharged home.

Conclusions

Although the bulk of neurological improvement occurred before the inpatient rehabilitation, thrombolysis-treated patients continue to improve faster and to a larger extent during the rehabilitation period suggesting that the beneficial effects of thrombolysis continue beyond the acute phase.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • § Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • # Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • ⁎⁎ Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • †† Disclosure: nothing to disclose

 Supported by the Peritz and Chantal Sheinberg Cerebrovascular Research Fund and by the Sol Irwin Juni Trust Fund.

 Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org

 This CME activity is designated for 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ and can be completed online at me.aapmr.org. Log on to www.me.aapmr.org, go to Lifelong Learning (CME) and select Journal-based CME from the drop down menu. This activity is FREE to AAPM&R members and $25 for non-members.

PII: S1934-1482(10)00448-X

doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.04.029

PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 8 , Pages 698-702, August 2010