Journal Home
Search for

Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages 607-611 (July 2010)


View previous. 3 of 16 View next.

Hypoesthesia in the Distal Residual Limb of Amputees

R. Norman Harden, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Christine M. Gagnon, PhDb, Anjum Khan, MDc, Gila Wallach, PhDd, Arzhang Zereshki, MDe

Received 4 November 2009; accepted 12 March 2010.

Objective

To test the emerging hypothesis that there is polymodal fiber degeneration/loss in distal residual limbs (DRL) of amputees.

Design

Prospective qualitative and quantitative psychophysical testing.

Setting

A pain research center at an urban academic rehabilitation hospital.

Participants

Forty-four amputees (32 with pain, 12 without pain) with a single (upper or lower) limb amputation. Subjects are a clinical “convenience” sample derived from our amputee or prosthetic clinics.

Methods

Interventions were prospectively acquired psychophysical tests. The primary quantitative test was thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing (tQST) using a Peltier type thermal testing device, assessing sites on the DRL compared with anatomically similar regions on the contralateral “unaffected” extremity.

Results

Perceptual responses for several qualitative psychophysical stimuli and perceptual thresholds for tQST cold sensation were significantly reduced in the DRL (t(43) = −2.613, P = .012). There were no significant tQST differences in thresholds for warm perception, cold pain, or hot pain (P > .05).

Conclusion

These results show a point prevalence of differential hypoesthesia in distal residual limbs. There was a selective loss of cold, but not warm perception or threshold for hot or cold pain by tQST. There are several possible explanations for this polymodal and selective hypoesthesia; specifically, these data may be indicative of a differential “dying back” peripheral neuropathy of the DRL, which may be operational in such clinical features as postamputation pain.

a Center for Pain Studies, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 446 E. Ontario, Suite 1011, Chicago, IL 60611; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

b Center for Pain Studies, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

c Center for Pain Studies, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL

d Center for Pain Studies, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL§

e Center for Pain Studies, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: R.N.H.

 Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org

 Disclosure: nothing to disclose

 Disclosure: nothing to disclose

 Disclosure: nothing to disclose

§ Disclosure: nothing to disclose

 Disclosure: nothing to disclose

PII: S1934-1482(10)00302-3

doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.03.033


View previous. 3 of 16 View next.