PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 268-276, April 2010

Efficacy of Intra-Articular Botulinum Toxin Type A in Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study

  • Andrea J. Boon, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to A.J.B.; 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905
  • ,
  • Jay Smith, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Diane L. Dahm, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN§
  • ,
  • Eric J. Sorenson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Dirk R. Larson, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Patrick D. Fitz-Gibbon, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN#
  • ,
  • Dennis D. Dykstra, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Minnesota Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN††
  • ,
  • Jasvinder A. Singh, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Rheumatology, VA Medical Center & University of Minnesota, Minneapolis & Departments of Health Sciences and Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MD‡‡

Received 7 August 2009; accepted 23 February 2010.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injected intra-articularly in 60 subjects with moderate pain and functional impairment secondary to knee osteoarthritis. The study investigators hypothesized that intra-articular BoNT-A would result in statistically significant improvements in pain and function at 8 weeks.

Design

Double-blind, randomized, single tertiary care academic medical center trial with 6-month follow-up.

Patients

Sixty patients aged 40 years or older with painful osteoarthritis of the knee who had failed physical therapy, medications, and/or injection therapy presenting to the musculoskeletal or orthopedic outpatient clinics at a large tertiary care medical institution. All 60 patients completed 8-week follow-up, but only 32 patients completed the 26-week follow-up.

Methods

Subjects were randomized to receive a single injection of corticosteroid, low-dose BoNT-A (100 units), or high-dose BoNT-A (200 units). Outcome measures were compared at baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks after injection.

Main Outcome Measurements

The primary outcome measure was pain visual analog scale (VAS) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included Western Ontario McMaster Arthritis Index, Short Form-36 scores, patient global assessment, 40-meter timed walk, and adverse effects.

Results

The primary end point was pain VAS score at 8 weeks, which decreased within each group but only reached statistical significance in the low-dose BoNT-A group. In the intra-articular corticosteroid group, VAS decreased from 6.4 ± 1.8 to 5.4 ± 2.3 (P = .15); for low-dose BoNT-A, from 6.6. ± 1.9 to 4.5 ± 2.2 (P = .01); and for high-dose BoNT-A, from 6.6 ± 1.4 to 5.9 ± 2.4 (P = .15). All groups showed statistically significant improvements in Western Ontario McMaster Arthritis Index scores (pain, stiffness, function) at 8 weeks. No serious adverse events were noted in any group.

Conclusions

This pilot study supports a possible role for BoNT-A as a treatment option for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis; however, larger double-blind randomized studies are needed to determine whether BoNT-A is more effective than placebo in this patient population.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • § Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • # Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • †† Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • ‡‡ Disclosure: 2A, URL Pharmaceuticals and Savient Pharmaceuticals; 7B, TAP and Savient Pharmaceuticals

 This study was supported by a grant from Mayo Clinic and Foundation.

 This CME activity is designated for 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ and can be completed online at me.aapmr.org. Log on to www.me.aapmr.org, go to Lifelong Learning (CME) and select Journal-based CME from the drop down menu. This activity is FREE to AAPM&R members and $25 for non-members.

PII: S1934-1482(10)00136-X

doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.02.011

PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 268-276, April 2010