PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 254-258, April 2010

The Influence of Initial Bipedal Stance Width on the Clinical Measurement of Unipedal Balance Time

  • James K. Richardson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Health Systems, 325 East Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI 48103
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to J.K.R.
  • ,
  • Chi Tang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Chijioke Nwagwu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, MI§
  • ,
  • Joseph Nnodim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, MI

Received 30 July 2009; accepted 28 January 2010.

Objective

To determine the effect of varying initial bipedal stance width (ISW) on the clinical measurement of unipedal balance time (UBT).

Design

Observational, cross-sectional study.

Setting

Academic physiatric outpatient facility.

Subjects

Thirty-one clinic subjects with neuromuscular and/or musculoskeletal conditions known to influence mobility and 30 similarly-aged healthy subjects.

Methods

Demographic and clinical information were recorded. UBT was determined under 3 distinct conditions by varying bipedal intermalleolar distance: (1) ISW of 0.3 body height; (2) ISW of 0.05 body height; and (3) ISW of 0 body height. The last was accomplished by subjects assuming unipedal balance while using the hands on a horizontal surface for stabilization. Subjects lifted the contralateral foot (or hands in the case of 0 body height condition) in response to a cadenced command to minimize variation in rate of weight transfer.

Main Outcome Measure

UBT under each of the 3 ISW conditions.

Results

Mean UBT increased with decreasing ISW, and the differences were significant when comparing each ISW with the next smaller. Healthy subjects demonstrated greater UBT than clinic subjects at each ISW, but the magnitude of these group differences were similar across ISW condition. A UBT >10 seconds in the 0.3 body height ISW was the best discriminator between clinic and healthy subjects.

Conclusion

Because UBT varies with ISW, standardization of ISW is necessary for accurate within-subject, and between-subject, comparisons in UBT. Healthy subjects were best differentiated from clinic subjects by UBT >10 seconds in the 0.3 body height ISW condition.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • § Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose

 This CME activity is designated for 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ and can be completed online at me.aapmr.org. Log on to www.me.aapmr.org, go to Lifelong Learning (CME) and select Journal-based CME from the drop down menu. This activity is FREE to AAPM&R members and $25 for non-members.

PII: S1934-1482(10)00086-9

doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.01.017

PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 254-258, April 2010