PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 195-201, March 2010

Postinjury Personality and Outcome in Acquired Brain Injury: The Millon Behavioral Medicine Diagnostic

  • Kelley D. Beck, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Integra Hospital of Plano, Day Neuro, 2301 Marsh Lane, Plano, TX 75093
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to K.D.B.
  • ,
  • Susan F. Franks, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX
  • ,
  • James R. Hall, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX

Received 2 June 2009; accepted 15 December 2009.

Objective

To examine the relationship between postinjury personality and outcome in individuals with acquired brain injury. It was hypothesized that patients with differing levels of Introversive, Dejected, and Oppositional coping styles as described by Millon's Theory of Personality would show different outcomes after completion of a rehabilitation program.

Design

A retrospective chart review and completion of an outcome assessment was undertaken to examine study hypotheses.

Setting

A postacute brain injury rehabilitation program.

Participants

Fifty patients who completed the rehabilitation program between 2005 and 2008, who were 18 years of age or older, who possessed at least a sixth-grade reading level, and who completed a valid Millon Behavioral Medicine Diagnostic (MBMD) were selected. Rehabilitation therapists who worked with these patients were also recruited to assess patient outcomes.

Methods

Charts of patients that met inclusion criteria were reviewed. Rehabilitation therapists completed the outcome measure retrospectively. The MBMD was used to predict outcome. The MBMD is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess psychosocial factors that relate to the course of medical treatment in chronic illness.

Main Outcome Measurements

The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) was used to assess patient outcome. It is a 29-item assessment designed to evaluate the common physical, cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and social issues after acquired brain injury.

Results

Findings supported our hypotheses that patients with differing levels of Introversive and Oppositional Coping Styles would have significantly different outcomes after rehabilitation. Thus, individuals with mild/moderate to moderate/severe limitations had significantly greater scores on the Introversive and Oppositional coping compared with individuals with more successful outcomes.

Conclusions

The results of this study support the idea that postinjury personality is an important factor in understanding outcome after completion of a brain-injury rehabilitation program. Personality variables accounted for significant variance above and beyond variance accounted for by the severity of the injury alone. These findings have important implications for the development and implementation of rehabilitation treatment planning.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose

 This CME activity is designated for 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ and can be completed online at me.aapmr.org. Log on to www.me.aapmr.org, go to Lifelong Learning (CME) and select Journal-based CME from the drop down menu. This activity is FREE to AAPM&R members and $25 for non-members.

PII: S1934-1482(09)01645-1

doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.12.007

PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 195-201, March 2010