PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 117-124 , February 2010

Implementation of Peer Review into a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Program and its Effect on Professionalism

  • Jaclyn Bonder, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New York University, 400 E. 34th Street, Suite 600, New York, NY 10016†
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: J.B.
    • ,
  • Douglas Elwood, MD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New York University, New York, NY‡
    • ,
  • Jeffrey Heckman, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New York University, New York, NY§
    • ,
  • Austin Pantel, BS

      Affiliations

    • New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
    • ,
  • Alex Moroz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New York University, New York, NY∥

Received 31 July 2009 ,Accepted 26 November 2009.

References 

  1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Outcome Project. http://www.acgme.orgFebruary 1999;Accessed August 16, 2008
  2. Blackall GF, Melnick SA, Shoop GH, et al. Professionalism in medical education: The development and validation of a survey instrument to assess attitudes toward professionalism. Med Teacher. 2007;29:e58–e62
  3. Surdyk PM, Lynch DC, Leach DC. Professionalism: Identifying current themes. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2003;16:597–602
  4. Joyner B, Vemulakonda VM. Improving professionalism: Making the implicit more explicit. J Urol. 2007;177:2287–2291
  5. West CP, Huntington JL, Huschka MM, et al. A prospective study of the relationship between medical knowledge and professionalism among internal medicine residents. Acad Med. 2007;82:587–592
  6. Arnold L. Assessing professional behavior: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med. 2002;77:516–522
  7. Fries M. Professionalism in obstetrics-gynecology residency education: the view of program directors. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:314–316
  8. DeLisa JA, Foye PM, Jain SS, Kirshblum S, Christodoulou C. Measuring professionalism in a physiatry training program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:225–229
  9. Mustovic E, Miknevich MA, Fletcher C. An innovative method for teaching professionalism in a PM&R residency. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:203
  10. Dorotta I, Staszak J, Takla A, Tetzlaff J. Teaching and evaluating professionalism for anesthesiology residents. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18:148–160
  11. Rodgers KG, Manifold C. 360-degree feedback: Possibilities for assessment of the ACGME core competencies for emergency medicine residents. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1300–1304
  12. Maker VK, Donnelly MB. Surgical resident peer evaluations – What have we learned. J Surg Educ. 2008;65:8–16
  13. Gray JD. Global rating scales in residency education. Acad Med. 1996;71:S55–S62
  14. Haurani MJ, Rubinfeld I, Rao S, et al. Are the communication and professionalism competencies the new critical values in a resident's global evaluation process?. J Surg Educ. 2007;64:351–356
  15. Thomas PA, Gebo KA, Hellmann DB. A pilot study of peer review in residency training. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:551–554
  16. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD. Peer ratings: An assessment tool whose time has come. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:581–582
  17. Musick DW, McDowell SM, Clark N, Salcido R. Pilot study of a 360-deg assessment instrument for physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:394–402
  18. Arnold L, Shue CL, Kalishman S, et al. Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? (A multi-institutional study). Acad Med. 2007;82:578–586
  19. Tintinalli JE. Evaluation of emergency medicine residents by nurses. Acad Med. 1989;64:49–50
  20. DiMatteo MR. Predicting patient satisfaction from physicians' nonverbal communication skills. Med Care. 1980;18:376–387
  21. Cornstock LM. Physician behaviors that correlate with patient satisfaction. Acad Med. 1982;57:105–112

 Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org

PII: S1934-1482(09)01621-9

doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.11.013

PM&R
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 117-124 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution