PM&R
Volume 1, Issue 10 , Pages 925-931, October 2009

Sonographically Guided Posterior Subtalar Joint Injections: Anatomic Study and Validation of 3 Approaches

  • Troy Henning, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Jonathan T. Finnoff, DO

      Affiliations

    • Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Jay Smith, MD

      Affiliations

    • Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, E10 Mayo Building, 200 1st St, SW, Rochester, MN 55905§
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: J.S.

Received 8 May 2009; accepted 8 September 2009.

Objective

To describe and validate 3 different approaches to perform sonographically guided posterior subtalar joint (PSTJ) injections.

Design

Sonographically guided procedures performed on cadaveric specimens.

Setting

Procedural skills lab at a tertiary medical facility.

Methods

Three ultrasound-guided approaches to inject the PSTJ: anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral were derived based on anatomic review, published fluoroscopic and computed tomography (CT) techniques, and clinical experience. Three separate unembalmed cadaveric ankle-foot specimens were injected by a single, experienced operator using a 25-gauge, 38-mm stainless steel needle. A different approach was used on each specimen. The needles were left in place and each specimen was subsequently dissected by co-investigators to confirm accurate needle placement and determine the proximity of each needle to local tendons and neurovascular structures.

Main Outcome Measurements

Direct assessment of needle placement within posterior subtalar joint.

Results

All 3 approaches provided accurate needle placement into the posterior subtalar joint while avoiding nearby tendinous and neurovascular structures.

Conclusions

Sonographically guided PSTJ injections are technically feasible. All 3 approaches provide accurate needle placement while minimizing the risk of needle entry into adjacent soft tissue structures not visualized by other modalities such as fluoroscopy or CT.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • § Disclosure: nothing to disclose

 Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org

PII: S1934-1482(09)01362-8

doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.09.006

PM&R
Volume 1, Issue 10 , Pages 925-931, October 2009