Poster 8: Effects of a Rehabilitation and Educational-Behavioral Program on Spinal Mobility in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis in Anti-TNFα Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Article Outline
- Disclosures
- Objective
- Design
- Setting
- Participants
- Interventions
- Main Outcome Measures
- Results
- Conclusions
- Copyright
Keywords: Rehabilitation, Exercise, Ankylosing spondylitis
Disclosures
S. Masiero, None.
Objective
To evaluate the effects on spinal mobility of a rehabilitation and educational-behavioral program in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in anti-TNFα therapy.
Design
Randomized controlled trial, 6-month follow-up.
Setting
Outpatients of Rheumatologic Department.
Participants
Fifty-eight patients with AS in anti-TNFα therapy that started more than 9 months earlier were randomly allocated to 3 groups.
Interventions
Group A (n = 18) received an educational-behavioral meeting with a home guide (2 hours) associated with an intensive group exercise program under the supervision of a physiotherapist (1 hour twice a week for 5 weeks) that was then performed at home; group B (n = 18) received only educational-behavioral information by a meeting with a home guide (2 hours); group C (n = 17) not effected any treatment.
Main Outcome Measures
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), chest expansion (in centimeters), standing thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, and active range of motion of spine by goniometer (IncliMed®): angular measures in 3 planes of cervical, lumbo-sacral spine were expressed in grades and summarized.
Results
Group A showed significant improvements defined as the difference between the 2 measurements (beginning and after 6 months) compared, respectively, with group B and C as resulted at the evaluation of the total range of motion on cervical spine (mean 48.4° ± 27.6 vs -2.5° ± 27.6 and 4.6° ± 30.1; P < .000) and lumbar spine (mean 39.1° ± 27.8 vs 9.4 ± 34.2, 9.4° ± 30.6; P = .007), chest expansion (mean 2.4 ± 1.5 vs 1.1 ± 1.9 and 0.9 ± 1.7; P = .004), BASMI (-1.1 ± -1.2 vs 0.1 ± -1.1 and 0.4 ± 0.5 ; P = .005).
Conclusions
The combination of intensive group exercise with an educational-behavioral program can improve spinal mobility in AS patients pharmacologically stabilized with anti-TNFα therapy. Thus, this approach may efficiently complement drug therapy in these patients.
PII: S1934-1482(09)00808-9
doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.08.021
© 2009 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
