PM&R
Volume 1, Issue 7 , Pages 629-635, July 2009

Inter-rater Reliability of Three Musculoskeletal Physical Examination Techniques Used to Assess Motion in Three Planes While Standing

  • Heidi Prather, DO

      Affiliations

    • Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: H.P.
  • ,
  • Devyani Hunt, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Karen Steger-May, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO§
  • ,
  • Marcie Harris Hayes, PT, DPT, OCS

      Affiliations

    • Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Evan Knaus, DO

      Affiliations

    • Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • John Clohisy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO#

Received 8 September 2008; accepted 13 May 2009.

Objective

The objective of the study was to measure the reliability between examiners of 3 basic maneuvers of the Total Body Functional Profile physical examination test. The hypothesis was musculoskeletal health care providers of different disciplines could reliably use the 3 basic maneuvers as part of the musculoskeletal physical examination.

Design

A prospective observational study was conducted. Twenty-eight adult volunteers were measured on both the left and right side by 2 independent raters on a single occasion.

Setting

The subjects were recruited through advertisements placed by the orthopedic department at a tertiary university.

Participants

Twenty-eight volunteers were recruited and completed the study. The volunteers were between the ages of 18 and 51 years of age, had no symptoms in the lower extremity or spine, had no previous history of surgery or tumor involving the lower extremity, and no medical conditions that would preclude participation.

Methods

On a single occasion, 2 examiners per 1 volunteer were blinded to their own and each others' measurements. Each examiner assessed the distance of frontal and sagittal plane lunge and angle of motion for transverse plane testing.

Main Outcome Measurements

Inter-rater agreement is expressed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The difference between raters is reported with 95% CIs. Baseline demographics, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), and Harris hip questionnaires were completed by all participants.

Results

The UCLA and Harris hip scores showed no significant activity restrictions or pain limitations in all participants. The inter-rater reliability for sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane matrix testing was good with ICCs of 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.91), 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.94), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.91), respectively. The rater reliability between disciplines for transverse, sagittal, and frontal plane matrix testing was good with ICCs of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80-0.94), 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.94), and 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-0.95), respectively.

Conclusions

The inter-rater reliability for 3 basic maneuvers of the Total Body Functional Profile is good among musculoskeletal health care providers of different disciplines. These 3 maneuvers may be used consistently as part of the musculoskeletal physical examination.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • § Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: 8A, enrolled in research training program funded by NIH
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • # Disclosure: 8B, Curing Hip Disease Fund

 Supported in part by award number UL1RR024992 from the National Center for Research Resources. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health. This work was also supported in part by the Curing Hip Disease Fund.

 Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org

PII: S1934-1482(09)00513-9

doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.05.003

PM&R
Volume 1, Issue 7 , Pages 629-635, July 2009