PM&R
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 127-136 , February 2009

A Prospective, Masked 18-Month Minimum Follow-up On Neurophysiologic Changes In Persons with Spinal Stenosis, Low Back Pain, and No Symptoms

  • Andrew J. Haig, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, 325 E Eisenhower, Ann Arbor, MI 48108
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to A.J.H.
  • ,
  • Karen S.J. Yamakawa, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Christopher Parres, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Anthony Chiodo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Henry Tong, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Received 11 March 2008 ,Accepted 16 October 2008.

References 

  1. Aronow WS. Management of peripheral arterial disease. Cardiol Rev. 2005;13:61–68
  2. Goh KJ, Khalifa W, Anslow P, Cadoux-Hudson T, Donaghy M. The clinical syndrome associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Neurol. 2004;52:242–249
  3. Haig AJ, Tong HC, Kendall R. The bent spine syndrome: myopathy + biomechanics = symptoms. Spine J. 2006;6:190–194
  4. Boden S, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1178–1184
  5. Haig AJ, Tong HC, Yamakawa KSJ, et al. Spinal stenosis, back pain, or no symptoms at all? (A masked study comparing radiologic and electrodiagnostic diagnoses to the clinical impression). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:897–903
  6. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994;14:69–73
  7. Ertekin C, Sirin H, Koyuncuoglu HR, et al. Diagnostic value of electrical stimulation of lumbosacral roots in radiculopathies. Acta Neurol Scand. 1994;90:26–33
  8. Jacobson RE. Lumbar stenosis (An electromyographic evaluation). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;115:68–71
  9. Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A. Neurophysiologic investigation of patients with spinal stenosis. Spine. 1987;12:483–487
  10. Kondo M, Matsuda H, Kureya S, Shimazu A. Electrophysiological studies of intermittent claudication in lumbar stenosis. Spine. 1989;14:862–866
  11. Plastaras CT. Electrodiagnostic challenges in the evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2003;14:57–69
  12. Seppalainen AM, Alaranta H, Soini J. Electromyography in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981;21:55–66
  13. Haig AJ. Paraspinal denervation and the spinal degenerative cascade. Spine J. 2002;2:372–380
  14. Haig AJ, Tong HC, Yamakawa KS, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic testing for the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2005;30:2667–2676
  15. Haig AJ, Geisser ME, Tong HC, et al. Electromyographic and magnetic resonance imaging to predict lumbar stenosis, low-back pain, and no back symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:358–366
  16. Haig AJ, Tong HC, Yamakawa KS, et al. Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no back pain. Spine. 2006;31(25):2950–2957
  17. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1153–1157
  18. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowics M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:151–161
  19. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:277–279
  20. Ohlund C, Eek C, Palmblad S, Areskous B, Nachemson A. Quantified pain drawing in subacute low back pain (Validation in nonselected outpatient industrial sample). Spine. 1996;21:1021–1031
  21. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40:171–182
  22. Haig AJ, Weiner JB, Tew J, Quint D, Yamakawa K. The relation among spinal geometry on MRI, paraspinal electromyographic abnormalities, and age in person referred for electrodiagnostic testing of low back symptoms. Spine. 2002;27:1918–1925
  23. Porter RW. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine. 1996;21:2046–2052
  24. Tong HC, Young IA, Koch J, Haig AJ, Yamakawa KS, Wallbom A. Paraspinal electromyography that compares concentric with monopolar needles: a blinded study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:917–924
  25. Haig AJ, Yamakawa KSJ, Kendall R, Miner JA, Parres C, Harris M. masking in electrodiagnostic medicine research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:475–481
  26. Dillingham TR, Lauder TD, Andary M, Shannon S. Identifying lumbosacral radiculopathies: an optimal electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79:496–503
  27. Daube JR. AAEM Minimonograph #11: Needle examination in clinical electromyography. Muscle Nerve. 1991;4:685–700
  28. Haig AJ, LeBreck DB, Powley SG. Paraspinal mapping: quantified needle electromyography of the paraspinal muscles in persons without low back pain. Spine. 1995;20:715–721
  29. Haig AJ. clinical experience with paraspinal mapping, I: neurophysiology of the paraspinal muscles in various spinal disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1177–1184
  30. Haig AJ. Clinical experience with paraspinal mapping (II: a simplified technique that eliminates three fourths of needle insertions). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1185–1190
  31. Haig AJ. Paraspinal mapping (American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine course handout). Revised 2005. Rochester, MN: AANEM www.aanem.org
  32. Haig AJ, Yamakawa K, Hudson DM. Paraspinal electromyography in high lumbar and thoracic lesions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79:336–342
  33. Tong HC, Haig AJ, Yamakawa KSJ, Miner JA. Paraspinal electromyography: age-correlated normative valves in asymptotic subjects. Spine. 2005;30(17):499–502
  34. Dumitru D, Diaz CA, King JC. Prevalence of denervation in paraspinal and foot intrinsic musculature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:482–490
  35. Gatens PF, Saeed MA. Electromyographic findings in the intrinsic muscles of normal feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:317–318
  36. Dumitru D, Amato A, Zwarts MJ. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley and Belfus; 2001;
  37. Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle: Principles and Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001;
  38. Date ES, Mar EY, Bugola MR, Teraoka JK. The prevalence of lumbar paraspinal spontaneous activity in asymptomatic subjects. Muscle Nerve. 1996;19:350–354
  39. Durette MR, Rodriquez AA, Agre JC, Silverman JL. Needle electromyographic evaluation of patients with myofascial or fibromyalgic pain. Am J. Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;70:154–156
  40. Atlas S, Chang Y, Wu Y, Keller R, Singer D. Predictors of longitudinal outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis followed over a 10 year period. New York, NY: International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine; 2005;May 12, poster 106
  41. Fisher MA, Kacr D, Houchin J. Electrodiagnostic examination, back pain, and entrapment of posterior rami. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;25:187
  42. Benoist M. The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. J Bone Spine Rev Rhumat. 2002;69:450–457
  43. Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A. The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis (A comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients). Spine. 1991;16:615–619
  44. Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop. 1992;279:82–86
  45. Porter RW, Hibbert C, Evans C. The natural history of root entrapment syndrome. Spine. 1984;9:418–421

 Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org

 This is a publication of the Spine Program of the University of Michigan, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, under Grant 5 R01 NS41855-02. The opinions contained in this publication are those of the grantee and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The funding source had no role in any of the following: the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

PII: S1934-1482(08)00020-8

doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.10.007

PM&R
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 127-136 , February 2009