PM&R
Volume 1, Issue 3 , Pages 214-222, March 2009

Effects of Concurrent Use of an Ankle Support with a Laterally Wedged Insole for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

  • Neil A. Segal, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City; VA Medical Center, Knoxville, TN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: N.A.S.; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, 0728 JPP Iowa City, IA 52242-1088
  • ,
  • Norah A. Foster, BA

      Affiliations

    • Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • ,
  • Shweta Dhamani, PT

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • ,
  • Kenjirou Ohashi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA§
  • ,
  • H. John Yack, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Received 3 July 2008; accepted 13 September 2008. published online 09 February 2009.

Objective

To determine the biomechanical and symptomatic effects of concurrent use of an ankle support and a laterally wedged insole on adults with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Design

Randomized, crossover clinical trial.

Setting

Outpatient gait analysis laboratory.

Participants

Fourteen adults, mean age 51.9 ± 8.3 years, with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and no previous lower-limb surgeries or history of wedged insole use were recruited through a radiology database and phone screen.

Interventions

Subjects were randomized to use a laterally wedged insole before (n = 8) or after (n = 6) use of the insole with an ankle support for 2 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures

Lower-limb alignment by radiographic hip–knee–ankle angle, talocalcaneal, and talar tilt angles; medial compartment loading by the external knee adduction moment; and pain by visual analog scale and the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscale.

Results

There were no differences between groups for age, gender, body mass index, baseline knee pain, or alignment. Augmentation of the wedged insole with the ankle supporter did not result in any significant changes in lower-limb alignment or external knee adduction moment. Intergroup crossover comparisons demonstrated a 10.5-point greater average improvement in Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscale (P < .011) and a trend towards a 10.2-point improvement in the Activities of Daily Living subscale (P < .055) with the wedged insole alone in comparison with concurrent use of the ankle support with the wedged insole.

Conclusion

Concurrent use of an ankle support did not appear to improve the effects of a laterally wedged insole on lower-limb mechanical alignment or medial compartment loading. Improved pain and activities of daily living with use of the wedged insole alone suggests that use of an ankle support may attenuate clinical benefit.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  • § Disclosure: nothing to disclose
  •  Disclosure: nothing to disclose

 Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org

 This study received financial support from the Physiatric Association of Spine, Sports & Occupational Rehabilitation (PASSOR) and the Foundation for Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. A portion of this manuscript was presented at the AAPM&R 2006 Annual Assembly in Honolulu, Hawaii.

PII: S1934-1482(08)00017-8

doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.09.005

PM&R
Volume 1, Issue 3 , Pages 214-222, March 2009